Belle Epoque
May. 10th, 2009 06:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Spent this morning making a muslin of a top that I know I have to alter. It was the only simple non-button-front, non empire line, non stretch top I could find in 6 pattern companies*, and would be perfect did it not date to an era of rather loser fitting clothes and can be pulled on over the head. Somehow, therefore, I have to alter it. Firstly, however, I have to work out what size I should be altering. I am normally a 12, but there was so much ease I made a 10. Now I can’t work out whether the basic fit would be better in an 8 or a 12. Happily I have lots of old sheeting so I can make both, but I think I’m going to end up over at Pattern Review begging for help. I suppose I shall learn from it. I really need to make a Vogue fitting shell. Also, the much-lauded Fit for Real People (honestly, you can tell from the title) is completely useless.
I saw Chéri at the pictures this afternoon. It looks gorgeous, but is unfortunately not a very good film. The script is a mixed bag, the pace all over the place, it’s wholly unsexy despite the subject matter, and Michelle Pfeiffer, though she acts reasonably well (though nothing like as well as the critical plaudits she’s been getting would suggest), is miscast. My impression of Léa in the novel was of a sensual, practical, fairly intelligent woman with a degree of self-knowledge. Pfeiffer just isn’t interesting – one doesn’t wonder about her background, what she finds amusing, what she likes to eat (indeed she doesn’t eat onscreen at all - ‘maigre’ indeed). Rupert Friend, on the other hand, is rather good as the young man who isn’t vacuous enough to be happy, but doesn’t know what to do with himself in the circumstances. He’s trivial, often spiteful, charmless and monumentally selfish and self-absorbed, but retains, though largely oblivious to the fact, genuine feelings.
There is a 1950s French version I’m curious to see, but I can’t help thinking that what it really needs is a stage adaptation by Ibsen. A central heroine, a closed community of shuttered lives, desires suppressed and unknown. It’s right up his street. Although I’m not sure whether in the Ibsen version Edmée would end up making a respectable but dull marriage, announcing she intends to set up a business, or running off to seduce the King of the Belgians.
*It is very tedious that despite producing fashionable (or at least modern) skirts, suits, dresses and trousers, pattern companies only seem to manage the dullest shirts, empire line tunics for 15 year olds, and other tops that the FLDS would consider desperately out-of-date.
I saw Chéri at the pictures this afternoon. It looks gorgeous, but is unfortunately not a very good film. The script is a mixed bag, the pace all over the place, it’s wholly unsexy despite the subject matter, and Michelle Pfeiffer, though she acts reasonably well (though nothing like as well as the critical plaudits she’s been getting would suggest), is miscast. My impression of Léa in the novel was of a sensual, practical, fairly intelligent woman with a degree of self-knowledge. Pfeiffer just isn’t interesting – one doesn’t wonder about her background, what she finds amusing, what she likes to eat (indeed she doesn’t eat onscreen at all - ‘maigre’ indeed). Rupert Friend, on the other hand, is rather good as the young man who isn’t vacuous enough to be happy, but doesn’t know what to do with himself in the circumstances. He’s trivial, often spiteful, charmless and monumentally selfish and self-absorbed, but retains, though largely oblivious to the fact, genuine feelings.
There is a 1950s French version I’m curious to see, but I can’t help thinking that what it really needs is a stage adaptation by Ibsen. A central heroine, a closed community of shuttered lives, desires suppressed and unknown. It’s right up his street. Although I’m not sure whether in the Ibsen version Edmée would end up making a respectable but dull marriage, announcing she intends to set up a business, or running off to seduce the King of the Belgians.
*It is very tedious that despite producing fashionable (or at least modern) skirts, suits, dresses and trousers, pattern companies only seem to manage the dullest shirts, empire line tunics for 15 year olds, and other tops that the FLDS would consider desperately out-of-date.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 05:38 pm (UTC)I am not built for the Regency period.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 06:01 pm (UTC)Damn. Someone is having a bonfire. Must get the washing in.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 06:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 05:42 pm (UTC)Best of luck with the top project - it sounds fascinating. I have not yet progressed beyond just sewing the go-on-over-the-head stuff and putting ties on the back.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 06:43 pm (UTC)Fingers are crossed for the top project. I have some gorgeous Liberty lawn covered with waterlilies, though sadly I have not found some suitably non-infant frog buttons.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 06:29 pm (UTC)Back when I did lots and lots of sewing, I usually made things up based roughly on patterns from the Burda Mode magazines, which was an easy and cheap way of getting lots of basic shapes to base things on. If you wanted me to look through and see whether there's anything more suitable for your purposes than the pattern you got, I could have a look through for you.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 06:49 pm (UTC)If you could have a look at your old Burda stuff, I'd be very grateful. I'm after a fairly plain top (because I want to do things to it), for woven fabric, fitted in the front and back, so probably with a side-opening, or me needing to put one in. I may well try a bias version at some point, but not with this fabric.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 07:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 08:16 pm (UTC)Actually, I'm sure I saw a nice dress with pleats at the waist looking not a million miles away (to the best of my recollection) in a sewing magazine (prob. Sew Today) last month. I do wish Vintage Vogue weren't so 50s oriented.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 08:46 pm (UTC)